Spinal Tuberculosis – Recent Trends of Surgical Management in Modern Era

Volume 16 | Issue 1 | January-March 2021 | Page 24-30 | Sameer Ruparel, Ankit Patel, Vishal Kundnani, Saijyot Raut


Authers: Sameer Ruparel [1], Ankit Patel [2], Vishal Kundnani [2], Saijyot Raut [2]

[1] Consultant Spine Surgeon, Jaslok and Global Hospitals, Mumbai.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Lilavati and Bombay Hospitals, Mumbai.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Vishal Kundnani,
Room No 3 , OPD block, Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre, Reclamation, Bandra West, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400050.
E-mail: kundnanivishal@yahoo.co.in


Abstract

Principles of treatment for surgical management of spinal tuberculosis has been ever changing over the years. With advances in medical management and surgical techniques, the aim is to achieve optimum functional outcomes with minimum patient morbidity. Development of effective anti-tuberculous drugs and extensive trials over the years have now finally laid down basic principles and indications of this ‘medical disease’. The principles of surgical treatment include optimum debridement and decompression, adequate bone on bone contact for fusion, providing immediate stability for early mobilization with an approach which causes least morbidity coupled with effective ATT. To achieve these goals either anterior/ posterior / combined approaches can be utilized with each having their advantages and disadvantages. Similarly, the treatment principles for healed TB spines are entirely different due to altered pathology and biomechanics. However, to reduce the morbidity of available surgical techniques, recent success of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery has prompted spine surgeons to utilize them for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Modern technologies like endoscopic approaches, percutaneous biopsies and pedicle screw fixation, expandable muscle splitting retractors and intervertebral cages, intra operative neuromonitoring and navigation have recently revolutionized the surgical management of spinal tuberculosis. This manuscript focusses on the development of recent surgical principles, techniques and trends for the treatment of Koch’s spine.
Keywords: Spinal Tuberculosis, Koch’s spine, recent advances, surgery, surgical management.


References

1. Tuli SM. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 2004. Textbook- Tuberculosis of the skeletal system (Bones, Joints, Spine and Bursal sheaths).
2. Barnes PF, Barrows SA. Tuberculosis in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:400-10.
3. Patel S, Collins DA, Bourke BE. Don’t forget tuberculosis. Am Rheum Dis. 1995;54:174-5.
4. Duraiswami PK, Tuli SM. 5000 years of orthopaedics in India. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;75:269-80.
5. Scott JE, Taor WS. The changing pattern of bone and joint tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:1331-42.
6. Bick KM. Classics of Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co.; 1976.
7. Dobson J. Tuberculosis of spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33:517-31.
8. Seddon HJ. Pott’s paraplegia, prognosis and treatement. Br J Surg. 1935;22:769-99.
9. Albee FH. The bone graft operation for tuberculosis of spine. JAMA. 1930;94:1467-71.
10. Hibbs RA, Risser JC. Treatment of vertebral tuberculosis by the spine fusion operations. J Bone Joint Surg. 1928;10:805-14.
11. Mercer W. Then and now: the history of skeletal tuberculosis. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1964;10:243-54.
12. Andre T. Studies on the distribution of tritium-labelled dihydrostrptomyem and tetracycline in the body. Acta Radiol. 1956;46:1-89.
13. Barclay WR, Ebert RH, Le Roy GV, et al. Distribution and excretion of radioactive isoniazid in tuberculosis patients. JAMA. 1953;151:1384-8.
14. Stevenson FH, Manning CW. Tuberculosis of the spine treated conservatively with chemotherapy, series of 72 patients collected 1949-1954 and followed to 1961. Tubercle. 1962;43:406-11.
15. Hodgson AR, Stock FE. Anterior spinal fusion for the treatment of tuberculosis of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:1147-56.
16. Konstam PG, Konstam ST. Spinal tuberculosis in southern Nigeria with special reference to ambulant treatment of thoracolumbar disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1958;40:26-32.
17. Oga M Arizono T, Takasita M, et al. Evaluation of the risk of instrumentation as a foreign body in spinal tuberculosis: clinical and biologic study. Spine. 1993;18:1890-4.
18. Rajasekaran S. The natural history of post-tubercular kyphosis in children. Radiological signs which predict late increase in deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(7):954-962.
19. Zaveri G. The role of posterior surgery in spinal tuberculosis. Argo Spine News J. 2011;23(3);112-119.
20. H L Bailey, M Gabriel, A R Hodgson, J S Shin. Tuberculosis of the spine in children. Operative findings and results in one hundred consecutive patients treated by removal of the lesion and anterior grafting J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(8):1633-57.
21. Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S. Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1314-23.
22. Upadhyay SS, Sell P, Saji MJ, et al. 17-year prospective study of surgical management of spinal tuberculosis in children. Hong Kong operation with debridement surgery for short and long-term outcome of deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:1704-11.
23. Upadhyay M, Patel J, Kundnani V, Ruparel S, Patel A. Drug sensitivity patterns in Xpert-positive spinal tuberculosis: an observational study of 252 patients. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(7):1476-1482.
24. Dai LY, Jiang LS, Wang W, Cui YM. Single-stage anterior autogenous bone grafting and instrumentation in the surgical management of spinal tuberculosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2342–2349.
25. Zhao J, Lian XF, Hou TS, Ma H, Chen ZM. Anterior debridement and bone grafting of spinal tuberculosis with one stage instrumentation anteriorly or posteriorly. Int Orthop 2007;31:859–863.
26. Cui X, Li LT, Ma YZ. Anterior and posterior instrumentation with different debridement and grafting procedures for multi-level contiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis. Orthop Surg. 2016;8(4):454–61.
27. Dunn RN, Ben HM. Spinal tuberculosis. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(4):425–31.
28. Li W, Liu Z, Xiao X, Zhang Z, Wang X. Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20:570.
29. Huang QS, Zheng C, Hu Y, Yin X, Xu H, Zhang G, Wang Q: One-stage surgical management for children with spinal tuberculosis by anterior decompression and posterior instrumentation. Int Orthop 2009;33:1385-1390.
30. Talu U, Gogus A, Ozturk C, Hamzaoglu A, Domanic U. The role of posterior instrumentation and fusion after anterior radical debridement and fusion in the surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis: experience of 127 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(8):554-9.
31. Garg B, Kandwal P, Nagaraja UB, Goswami A, Jayaswal A. Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46(2):165-70.
32. Liu J, Wan L, Long X, Huang S, Dai M, Liu Z. Efficacy and safety of posterior versus combined posterior and anterior approach for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(6):1157-1165.
33. Lonstein JE. Cord compression. In: Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, Ogilvie JW et al. (Eds). Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 2nd edition. Philadelphia:WB Saunders;1987.pp540-7.
34. Dalvie SS, Laheri VJ. Closed-wedge spinal osteotomy for the correction of post-tubercular kyphosis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:283-284.
35. Kanna RM, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Surgical management of Pott’s spine induced kyphosis in older children or adults. Curr Orthop Pract. 2017;28:15-22.
36. Bezer M, Mucukdurmaz F, Guven O. Transpedicular decancellation osteotomy in the treatment of post-tubercular kyphosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:209-15.
37. Kalra KP, Dhar SB, Shetty G, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for rigid post-tubercular kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:925-7.
38. Deng Y, Lv G, An HS. En bloc spondylectomy for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis with fixed and sharply angulated kyphotic deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2140-6.
39. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Baba H, et al. Closing-opening wedge osteotomy to correct angular kyphotic deformity by a single posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:391-402.
40. Gertzbein SD, Harris MB. Wedge osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic kyphosis. A new technique and a report of three cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:374-9.
41. Kanna RM, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Surgical management of Pott’s spine induced kyphosis in older children or adults. Curr Orthop Pract. 2017;28:15-22.
42. Patel A, Ruparel S, Dusad T, Mehta G, Kundnani V. Posterior-approach single-level apical spinal osteotomy in pediatric patients for severe rigid kyphoscoliosis: long-term clinical and radiological outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(6):606-614.
43. Wang K, Wang N, Wang Y, et al. Anterior versus posterior instrumentation for treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis : A meta-analysis. Orthopade. 2019 Mar;48(3):207-212.
44. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley FT. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): Technical Feasibility and Initial Results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18 Suppl:S1-6.
45. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(11):2265-70.
46. Ashizawa R, Ohtsuka K, Kamimura M, et al. Percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae–method and diagnostic validity. Surg Neurol. 1999;52:545-51.
47. Jayaswal A, Upendra B, Ahmed A, et al. Video-assisted tharacoscopic anterior surgery for tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:100-107.
48. Tong YJ, Liu JH, Fan SW, et al. One-stage Debridement via Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Corridor Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Spontaneous Lumbar Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series. Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1109-1119.
49. Jayaswal A, Upendra B, Ahmed A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior surgery for tuberculous spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jul;460:100-7.
50. Kapoor SK, Agarwal PN, Jain BK Jr, et al. Video-assisted tharacoscopic decompression of tubercular spondylitis: clinical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:E605-E610.
51. Kandwal P, Garg B, Bn U, et al. Outcome of minimally invasive surgery in the management of tuberculous spondylitis. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46(2):159-64.
52. Hu W, Zhang X, Yu J, et al. Vertebral column decancellation in Pott’s deformity: use of Surgimap Spine for preoperative surgical planning, retrospective review of 18 patients BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):13.
53. Patel JY, Kundnani VG, Merchant ZI, Jain S, Kire N.Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.Asian Spine J. 2020 Feb;14(1):25-32.


How to Cite this article: Ruparel S, Patel A, Kundnani V, Raut S, Kundnani V. Spinal tuberculosis recent trends of surgical management in modern era. Journal of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery January-March 2021;16(1): 24-30.

(Abstract Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)