Volume 12 | Issue 4 | Oct-Dec 2017 | Page 13-16 | Ashutosh Bhosale, Amol Dhawale
Authers: Ashutosh Bhosale , Amol Dhawale .
Morya Foundation Hospital & Research Centre, Satara.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Ashutosh H. Bhosale
Consultant, Dept. of Orthopedics,
Morya Foundation Hospital & Research Centre, Satara
Email – email@example.com
Background: Introduction:The zone 2 flexor tendon injury is a common problem in clinical practice. Although many suture techniques are popular like Kessler, Modified Kessler, Bunnell, Savage, Lee, and Tsuge with their peculiarities none of them meet an ideal suture technique criteria. In this quest of an ideal tendon suture technique, Four Strand Cruciate design appears a strong contender in recent literature. The purpose of this study is to assess functional outcome of zone 2 flexor tendon repairs by Four Strand Cruciate suture design.
Materials & Methods: A consecutive group of patients with zone 2 flexor tendon injuries of hand were repaired with four strand cruciate technique during January 2014 to December 2015. This repair has 4 strands with a cruciate design at the repair site. It is a grasping type with knot coming away from the repair site. The postoperative protocol included Kleinert traction and Modified Brook Army Hospital regimen. Functional outcome was assessed by validated scores like Total Active Motion (TAM), Modified Strickland functional score, Quick DASH score.
Results: Between January 2014 to December 2015, 27 fingers with cut flexor tendons were sutured by this method. Average total activity motion (TAM) at 3 months was 51% and at 6 months it was 63%. At 3 months, by Modified Strickland Grading, 9 fingers rated excellent or good (33.33%) while 18 fingers rated fair (66.67%). At 6 months, 21 fingers (77.78%) rated excellent or good while 6 fingers were rated fair (22.22%). There were no poor results. The average QDASH at 3 months was 24.96 while at 6 months it was 11.59. Three fingers had re-rupture while 6 fingers had adhesions.
Conclusion: The results of flexor tendon repair with this method are up to the mark as compared to present literature with overall good patient satisfaction (QDASH).Four Strand Cruciate with high tensile strength and gap resistance can allow us to use aggressive post repair rehabilitation protocols. Thus the Four Strand Cruciate with its peculiarities causes fewer complications like re-ruptures and adhesions.,
Keywords: zone 2 flexor tendon injury, Four Strand Cruciate suture design, functional outcome
1. Savage R. In Vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 1985;10:135-141.
2. McLarney E, Hoffman H, Wolfe SW. Biomechanical analyses of the cruciate four strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg[AM] 1999;24:295-301.
3. Akoi M, Manaske PR, Pruitt DL, Kubota H, Larson BJ. Work of flexion after flexor tendon repair according to the placement of sutures. Clin Orthop 1995;320:205-210.
4. Akoi M, Manaske PR, Pruitt DL, Kubota H, Larson BJ. Work of flexion after flexor tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg[Br] 1995;20:310-313.
5. W. B. J. Rudge, M. James Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?ISRN Plastic Surgery Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 687128
6. Savage R. In vitro studies of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 1985;10:135-141.
7. Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries:Foundations of treatment.JAm Acd Orthop Surg 1995;3:44-54
8. Elliot D, Moiemen NS, Flemming AFS, Harris SB, Foster AJ. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994;19:607-612.
9. Sandow MJ, McMahon MM. Single cross grasp sixstrand repair for acute flexor tenorrhaphy: modified savage technioque. Atlas Hand Clin 1966;1:41-64.
10. Chow SP, Stephens MW, Ngai WK. A splint for controlled active motion after flexor tendon repair.Design, mechanical testing, & results. J Hand Surg [Am] 1990;15:645-651.
11. Alice Wichelhaus et al. Four-Strand Core Suture Improves Flexor Tendon Repair Compared to Two-Strand Technique in a Rabbit Model. Biomed Research International 2016; 2016: 4063137.
12. Akoi M, Pruit DL, Manske PR. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg [Br] 1996;21:969-973.
13. Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi. Biomechanical comparison of the four-strand cruciate and Strickland techniques in animal tendons Clinics vol.68 no.12 São Paulo Dec. 2013
14. MH Yuen, WY Ip Tensile strength of modified 4-strand cruciate technique for transversely or obliquely lacerated tendons Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2007;15(1):27-31
|How to Cite this article: Bhosale A, Dhawale A. The results of zone 2 flexor tendon repair with Four Strand Cruciate suture technique. Journal of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. July – Sep 2017;12(4):13-16.|